Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Jul 01, 2016
  2. Jun 28, 2016
  3. Jun 26, 2016
  4. Jun 25, 2016
    • Daniel Povey's avatar
      Merge pull request #800 from jfainberg/yesno_path · 3a984f99
      Daniel Povey authored
      yesno recipe data prep: paths to absolute + misc. 
      3a984f99
    • jfainberg's avatar
      Minor change to original to allow abs path · b6424584
      jfainberg authored
      b6424584
    • Shiyin Kang's avatar
      _diff_softmax kernel: 4 reads and 1 write. · 6b8eefbb
      Shiyin Kang authored
      New: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<float>, for dim = 16, speed was 0.0165568 gigaflops.
      Old: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<float>, for dim = 16, speed was 0.00355242 gigaflops.
      New: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<float>, for dim = 32, speed was 0.0678791 gigaflops.
      Old: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<float>, for dim = 32, speed was 0.0145515 gigaflops.
      New: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<float>, for dim = 64, speed was 0.24739 gigaflops.
      Old: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<float>, for dim = 64, speed was 0.0583246 gigaflops.
      New: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<float>, for dim = 128, speed was 0.898427 gigaflops.
      Old: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<float>, for dim = 128, speed was 0.225076 gigaflops.
      New: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<float>, for dim = 256, speed was 2.89009 gigaflops.
      Old: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<float>, for dim = 256, speed was 0.834096 gigaflops.
      New: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<float>, for dim = 512, speed was 6.72164 gigaflops.
      Old: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<float>, for dim = 512, speed was 1.92722 gigaflops.
      New: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<float>, for dim = 1024, speed was 10.4916 gigaflops.
      Old: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<float>, for dim = 1024, speed was 2.78281 gigaflops.
      New: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<double>, for dim = 16, speed was 0.0148584 gigaflops.
      Old: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<double>, for dim = 16, speed was 0.00260567 gigaflops.
      New: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<double>, for dim = 32, speed was 0.0586865 gigaflops.
      Old: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<double>, for dim = 32, speed was 0.0121077 gigaflops.
      New: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<double>, for dim = 64, speed was 0.22893 gigaflops.
      Old: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<double>, for dim = 64, speed was 0.0527767 gigaflops.
      New: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<double>, for dim = 128, speed was 0.763462 gigaflops.
      Old: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<double>, for dim = 128, speed was 0.175736 gigaflops.
      New: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<double>, for dim = 256, speed was 2.40457 gigaflops.
      Old: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<double>, for dim = 256, speed was 0.58351 gigaflops.
      New: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<double>, for dim = 512, speed was 4.55165 gigaflops.
      Old: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<double>, for dim = 512, speed was 1.42464 gigaflops.
      New: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<double>, for dim = 1024, speed was 4.36421 gigaflops.
      Old: For CuMatrix::DiffSoftmaxPerRow<double>, for dim = 1024, speed was 1.94971 gigaflops.
      6b8eefbb
    • Shiyin Kang's avatar
      add speed test and unit test · 619889a1
      Shiyin Kang authored
      619889a1
    • Shiyin Kang's avatar
      mv diffsoftmax to cumatrix · 69ccd5ce
      Shiyin Kang authored
      69ccd5ce
  5. Jun 23, 2016
  6. Jun 22, 2016
    • Daniel Povey's avatar
      Merge pull request #823 from matthewaylett/master · db12957a
      Daniel Povey authored
      Fixed pitch_functions to behave correctly with snip_edges=false
      db12957a
    • Blaise Potard's avatar
      pitch_functions: Corrected the behaviour of snip_edges=falses · 4a2647bc
      Blaise Potard authored
       * Fixed snip_edges=false behaviour to have an expected feature delay of frame_shift/2 instead of being identical to the delay of snip_edges=true. This makes the behaviour of snip_edges=false consistent with other feature extractions tools.
       * Added a unit test that ensure snip_edges=false behaves as expected, by calculating the actual delay between outputs only differing by snip_edge through cross-correlation.
       * Refactored ExtractFrame to treat both edge cases symmetrically
       * Calculating window size / shift by dividing by 1000 instead of multiplying by 0.001 to fix unexpected behaviour with non integer window size / shift.
       * Made sure all changes pass google code validation
       * Changed all feature window functions to use precalculated factor: in my opinion it make the functions easier to compare, and it may be a bit faster.
      
      Note that the feature delay of snip_edges=true (the default) is rather difficult to predict (and almost certainly not what people assume), which almost certainly makes the use of pitch features problematic at the moment.
      I would suggest switching to snip_edges=false for new recipes.
      4a2647bc
    • Yiming Wang's avatar
      b21acc60
  7. Jun 21, 2016
  8. Jun 20, 2016
  9. Jun 17, 2016
  10. Jun 14, 2016
  11. Jun 13, 2016
  12. Jun 12, 2016
Loading